Formal review of std.buffer.scopebuffer

Jacob Carlborg doob at me.com
Mon Mar 17 12:28:37 PDT 2014


On 2014-03-17 20:07, Walter Bright wrote:

> ScopeBuffer has been there and commented on for about 2 months now.

That's because you created a pull request instead of asking for a formal 
review. A pull request should NOT be created until a module is accepted 
after a review and voting.

You're sneaking in a new module although it has not gone through a 
formal review. This is not how new modules should be added.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list