Formal review of std.buffer.scopebuffer

[monarch_dodra]

On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 20:51:05 UTC, sybrandy wrote:
> Apologies if this was answered elsewhere, but will this, or 
> something similar, be exposed in Phobos for others to use?  
> This seems like something that could be quite useful depending 
> on the application.  If not, why?

FWIW, I've also begun working on something similar which (I 
think) would be more acceptable for "public" inclusion. In 
particular, that would provide better memory safety (subset 
usable in @safe code), CTFE-able, and pure. And faster than 
Appender.