Formal review of std.buffer.scopebuffer

Andrei Alexandrescu SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org
Tue Mar 18 14:09:23 PDT 2014


On 3/18/14, 1:53 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2014-03-18 16:59, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>
>> I don't think we need a formal review process for internal modules.
>> Proper review of the pull request should suffice.
>
> I agree. But this module _started out_ as a public module. If we have
> had a formal review we could have discussed and decided in the review
> that the module doesn't fit to be public.

Instead we decided much quicker so it's all for the better. I really 
don't understand why the bickering about this still continues.

Andrei




More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list