inlining...

[Ola Fosheim Grøstad" <ola.fosheim.grostad+dlang at gmail.com>]

On Thursday, 20 March 2014 at 12:31:33 UTC, Manu wrote:
> I'm sorry. I really can't support any of these wildly complex 
> ideas.

They aren't actually complex, except tail-call optimization (but 
that is well understood).

> If you want to inline a second level, then write mixin in the 
> second level.

You might as well do copy-paste then. You cannot add inlining to 
an imported library without modifying it.

> at all, which is annoying, because I REALLY need this (I've 
> been trying to
> motivate inline support for over 3 years), and I get the 
> feeling you're
> just throwing hypotheticals around.

You need inlining, agree, but not 1 level mixin. Because you can 
do that with regular inlining.