Ruby-style "each" in D?

[Jacob Carlborg]

On Friday, 21 March 2014 at 00:42:00 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:

> Right on.

I'm using Ruby every day. I don't really see much point in having 
"each" in D. We already have "foreach". Ruby uses "each" since it 
doesn't have "foreach". It to have a "for", which is a form of 
foreach, but that is just lowered to "each" anyway.

Also, I don't see a point in having "each" which is lazy.

--
/Jacob Carlborg