On Friday, 21 March 2014 at 12:55:09 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote: > What's the purpose of "tee", is it the same as "tap"? "tap" in > Ruby just returns the receiver after executing a block. This > would be the implementation in D: Yeah "tee" is a horrible name, no chance I would have guess what it means just by the name. "tap" is much better.