Improve D's syntax to make it more python like

1100110 0b1100110 at gmail.com
Sun Mar 23 06:09:03 PDT 2014


On 3/21/14, 20:47, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 3/21/14, 5:18 PM, w0rp wrote:
>> On Friday, 21 March 2014 at 21:52:47 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
>>> I'm disappointed about how many discussions revolve around superficial
>>> things such as syntax, while neglecting weightier matters such as
>>> semantics and expressiveness.
>>>
>>>
>>> T
>>
>> http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Wadler%27s_Law
>>
>> People love to debate syntax. Semantics are much more interesting and
>> worth talking about.
>
> Well, one issue that's happening is that every so often github pull
> requests that are simple but important (such as documentation) sit there
> without getting due review. The regular contributors are spending time
> looking into them, with takes away time from more important issues they
> could work on.
>
> A dozen people are doing the simple work and the complicated work, while
> the rest of the forum sits on the sidelines wringing hands about what to
> do about the future of D.
>
>
> Andrei
>
You really want me to contribute?  Cause I will.

And due to my lack of education on the matter I will get all up in your 
way.   You want the community to help participate?  Get a list of simple 
moderate and hard jobs that are relatively high priority, and update the 
list weekly.   A "stickied" post on the announce forum would work.

Cause if there's something simple I can do, I'll do it.  I just don't 
know what I can do.



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list