Changing the behavior of the comma operator

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

On 3/25/14, 11:33 AM, Meta wrote:
> Having the comma expression return void is a pretty clever way of
> disallowing most of its buggy usage. You mentioned in the other thread
> that we are looking at 5 years or more before the comma operator can be
> used in tuple expressions. Is that timeline still accurate with these
> proposed changes?

I'm afraid so. But that's the case regardless.

Andrei