Changing the behavior of the comma operator

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

On 3/26/14, 3:13 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
> On 03/26/2014 08:49 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>>
>>> I don't agree. It's much better to fix the little breaking changes now,
>>> and think about non-breaking improvements later. Because later the
>>> breaking changes will become less and less possible.
>>
>> That later is already now.
>
> So how come there exists this thread on breaking the comma operator?

Because it's arguably worth it. -- Andrei