What would be the consequence of implementing interfaces as fat pointers ?

[Daniel Murphy]

"Walter Bright"  wrote in message news:lh83dr$6m1$1 at digitalmars.com...

> On 3/29/2014 8:26 PM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
> > It could, but we don't have a stable ABI
>
> ? The ABI for interfaces hasn't changed in many years. In fact I don't 
> even remember changes in it.

I meant stable in the sense that we _can't_ break it, not that we _haven't_ 
broken it recently.

ie we don't guarantee binary compatibility across releases.