What would be the consequence of implementing interfaces as fat pointers ?

[Walter Bright]

On 3/29/2014 8:38 PM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
> "Walter Bright"  wrote in message news:lh83dr$6m1$1 at digitalmars.com...
>
>> On 3/29/2014 8:26 PM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
>> > It could, but we don't have a stable ABI
>>
>> ? The ABI for interfaces hasn't changed in many years. In fact I don't even
>> remember changes in it.
>
> I meant stable in the sense that we _can't_ break it, not that we _haven't_
> broken it recently.
>
> ie we don't guarantee binary compatibility across releases.

ok.