Increasing performance with static polymorphism (and other neat tricks) - blog post

[Meta]

On Monday, 31 March 2014 at 23:57:09 UTC, srean wrote:
> On Monday, 31 March 2014 at 15:24:03 UTC, Meta wrote:
>> On Monday, 31 March 2014 at 15:22:23 UTC, Meta wrote:
>>> What's the title on Hackernews? I can't seem to find it.
>> Eh, nevermind, found it.
>
>> Hackernews really needs a search function.
>
> Erm thats where I am coming from, the search feature is there at
> the bottom, take a look at the footer.
>
> I have a slightly tangential question, repeating what I asked on
> HN
>
> Can't the destructor issue of scopebuffer be mitigated by using
>
>       hasElaborateDestructor( )
>
> For instance have two versions one with a destructor for non POD
> and another without. The compiler dispatches to the appropriate
> one at compile time. There should not be any loss in 
> performance.

Ah, you're right. That could definitely be better placed... I 
generally read the Hackernews RSS feed, not the site itself, so 
I'm not well-accustomed to the actual site.