Parallel execution of unittests
Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Thu May 1 04:21:00 PDT 2014
On 2014-05-01 09:10, Dicebot wrote:
> It is not strictly necessary but you can't reliably get all unit test
> blocks during compile-time (must be transitively imported) and current
> run-time reflection for tests is missing any data but actual function
> pointers. I am personally perfectly satisfied with "single root module
> imports all" approach but it is likely to be complained if proposed as
> "standard" way.
The current runner wouldn't work. It needs to be replace with one that
uses __traits(getUnitTests).
--
/Jacob Carlborg
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list