Parallel execution of unittests
Byron via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Thu May 1 06:26:39 PDT 2014
On Thu, 01 May 2014 11:44:11 +0000, w0rp wrote:
> On Thursday, 1 May 2014 at 11:05:55 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
>> On 2014-04-30 23:35, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>
>>> Agreed. I think we should look into parallelizing all unittests. --
>>> Andrei
>>
>> I recommend running the tests in random order as well.
>
> This is a bad idea. Tests could fail only some of the time. Even if bugs
> are missed, I would prefer it if tests did exactly the same thing every
> time.
Running tests in random order helps find hidden dependencies, but I
wouldn't want it as a default. I lot of unittesting libraries offer
this. If you don't run tests often it doesn't help much, but if you do
TDD it can help.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list