Parallel execution of unittests
Xavier Bigand via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Thu May 1 10:04:00 PDT 2014
Le 01/05/2014 13:44, w0rp a écrit :
> On Thursday, 1 May 2014 at 11:05:55 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
>> On 2014-04-30 23:35, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>> Agreed. I think we should look into parallelizing all unittests. --
>> I recommend running the tests in random order as well.
> This is a bad idea. Tests could fail only some of the time. Even if bugs
> are missed, I would prefer it if tests did exactly the same thing every
I am in favor of randomized order, cause it can help to find real bugs.
More information about the Digitalmars-d