Parallel execution of unittests
Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Thu May 1 11:49:23 PDT 2014
On 2014-05-01 17:15, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> That's all nice, but I feel we're going gung ho with overengineering
> already. If we give unittests names and then offer people a button
> "parallelize unittests" to push (don't even specify the number of
> threads! let the system figure it out depending on cores), that's a good
> step to a better world.
Sure. But on the other hand, why should D not have a great unit testing
framework built-in.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list