Parallel execution of unittests

Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Thu May 1 11:49:23 PDT 2014


On 2014-05-01 17:15, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:

> That's all nice, but I feel we're going gung ho with overengineering
> already. If we give unittests names and then offer people a button
> "parallelize unittests" to push (don't even specify the number of
> threads! let the system figure it out depending on cores), that's a good
> step to a better world.

Sure. But on the other hand, why should D not have a great unit testing 
framework built-in.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list