Parallel execution of unittests

Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Thu May 1 12:22:39 PDT 2014


On 5/1/14, 11:49 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2014-05-01 17:15, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>
>> That's all nice, but I feel we're going gung ho with overengineering
>> already. If we give unittests names and then offer people a button
>> "parallelize unittests" to push (don't even specify the number of
>> threads! let the system figure it out depending on cores), that's a good
>> step to a better world.
>
> Sure. But on the other hand, why should D not have a great unit testing
> framework built-in.

It should. My focus is to get (a) unittest names and (b) parallel 
testing into the language ASAP.

Andrei




More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list