Parallel execution of unittests

[Ary Borenszweig via Digitalmars-d]

On 5/1/14, 4:22 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 5/1/14, 11:49 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
>> On 2014-05-01 17:15, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>
>>> That's all nice, but I feel we're going gung ho with overengineering
>>> already. If we give unittests names and then offer people a button
>>> "parallelize unittests" to push (don't even specify the number of
>>> threads! let the system figure it out depending on cores), that's a good
>>> step to a better world.
>>
>> Sure. But on the other hand, why should D not have a great unit testing
>> framework built-in.
>
> It should. My focus is to get (a) unittest names and (b) parallel
> testing into the language ASAP.
>
> Andrei

What's the rush?