DIP61: redone to do extern(C++,N) syntax

[Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d]

On 5/2/2014 12:34 AM, "Ola Fosheim Grøstad" 
<ola.fosheim.grostad+dlang at gmail.com>" wrote:
> The implications with this DIP is that all library authors will have to follow a
> convention of having all C++ dependencies in a module named "cpp" in order to
> have a "fake" way of specifying fully qualified C++ names.

Not at all, any more than you have to do that for C names.


> This is not elegant. It is a hack.

C++ is not elegant, and interfacing to it will necessarily pick up some of that.