Isolated by example

[Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d]

On 5/2/14, 2:24 AM, deadalnix wrote:
> On Friday, 2 May 2014 at 09:05:13 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
>> On 5/1/2014 11:51 PM, deadalnix wrote:
>>> First the original post I made on this forum :
>>> http://forum.dlang.org/thread/kluaojijixhwigoujeip@forum.dlang.org#post-kluaojijixhwigoujeip:40forum.dlang.org
>>>
>>
>> It's nearly the same as http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP29 except that DIP29
>> tries to use a library type to take the role of 'isolated' in your
>> proposal.
>
> DIP29 is not safe, does not help to construct immutables, is not
> inferred, do not provide aliasing infos for the optimizer, etc...

I think a more detailed comparison would do well here. My understanding 
of DIP29 is quite at odds with these claims.

Andrei