More radical ideas about gc and reference counting
Nick B via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Fri May 2 18:32:31 PDT 2014
I forgot to add these comments by walter at the top of my
previous post:
> [walter Bright wrote ] the thing is, GC is a terrible and
> unreliable method of managing non-memory
resource lifetimes. Destructors for GC objects are not guaranteed
to ever run.
> So now it looks like dynamic arrays also can't contain structs
> with destructors :o). -- Andrei
Nick
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list