D For A Web Developer

Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sun May 4 06:45:57 PDT 2014


On 5/4/2014 12:34 AM, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d wrote:
>
> Regardless, unittest blocks don't really put any restrictions on what kind of
> code can go in them, and I'd prefer that that stay the case. The discussion
> on parallelizing unit tests threatens that on some level, but as long as we
> have the means to mark unittest blocks in some manner that tells the test
> runner not to run them in parallel with any other unittest blocks, then I
> think that we should be fine on that front.
>

Yes, this.



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list