Enforced @nogc for dtors?

[via Digitalmars-d]

On Monday, 5 May 2014 at 18:32:30 UTC, Brian Rogoff wrote:
> On Monday, 5 May 2014 at 17:46:35 UTC, Orvid King via 
> Digitalmars-d wrote:
>> Destructors and finalizers are the same thing.
>
> That is exactly the point that I am arguing against. That they 
> are confused in D (or 'unified', if you think is a good thing) 
> I accept, but I think it's a language design error, or at least 
> an unfortunate omission. Did you read the citation I provided? 
> I think Boehm's argument is convincing; you've provided no 
> rebuttal. The entire brouhaha going on now is because they're 
> different: we assume that destructors will be called at a 
> precise time so we can use them to manage constrained resources 
> and we don't know that about finalizers.

+1