radical ideas about GC and ARC : need to be time driven?

Marco Leise via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sun May 11 09:38:31 PDT 2014


Am Sun, 11 May 2014 14:52:50 +1000
schrieb Manu via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d at puremagic.com>:

> On 11 May 2014 05:39, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d
> <digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> wrote:
> > On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 09:16:54PM +0200, Xavier Bigand via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> >>  - Same question if D migrate to ARC?
> >
> > I highly doubt D will migrate to ARC. ARC will probably become
> > *possible*, but some language features fundamentally rely on the GC, and
> > I can't see how that will ever be changed.
> 
> Which ones are incompatible with ARC?

Pass-by-value slices as 2 machine words

-- 
Marco



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list