More radical ideas about gc and reference counting
John Colvin via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Mon May 12 03:59:53 PDT 2014
On Monday, 12 May 2014 at 10:51:33 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
> Time will tell if all "well written" D libraries will be @nogc
> to move the question of allocations to the user.
If there was such a thing as "weakly &nogc" then we would could
do this
//some library function
void foo(OR, IR)(OR o, IR i) @weak-nogc
{
//take things from i and put them in o
}
allocations would be possible during the execution of foo, but
*only* in the implementations of OR and IR, which means that the
developer gets the control and guarantees they need, but doesn't
have to explicitly pre-allocate (which might not even be
possible).
I don't see how it would work with UFCS though...
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list