More radical ideas about gc and reference counting

[Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d]

On 5/12/2014 10:07 AM, Dicebot wrote:
> We have already had discussion where I did state that current @nogc
> implementation is not robust enough and failed to explain the use case for
> weaker @nogc clearly. Conclusion was that we should return to this topic after
> Don's DConf talk ;)

Sure - next week!