isUniformRNG

[Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d]

On 23/05/14 21:38, Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> Oh, right. For some reason I was thinking "front", not "popFront". My bad.

Actually it's probably irrelevant in your case anyway, isn't it, because you'll 
be outputting raw binary data to a provided output range ... ?

> Well, I don't think crypto RNGs should be put together with non-RNG crypto stuff
> like SHA, etc. (Unless maybe it's all under a "std.crypto.*" package...but then
> you still have weird questions like "Does MD5 go in std.digest.md or
> std.crypto.digest.md? What about SHA-1?" So still maybe kinda hairy.)
>
> As for whether crypto RNGs should be together with non-crypto RNGs, I dunno. I
> can't really say I'd have much objection either way. I suppose there is general
> preference in D at this point to break up phobos modules wherever reasonable, so
> I guess something like this might generally be preferred:
>
> std/random/package.d
> std/random/deterministic.d
> std/random/crypto.d

OK, so let's run with the idea that at some point crypto RNGs will be a 
submodule of std.random.