Including Dub with D

Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sat May 24 10:51:38 PDT 2014


On 5/24/2014 10:15 AM, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
> Am 23.05.2014 08:24, schrieb Jacob Carlborg:
>> On 22/05/14 21:11, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>>
>>> Is there anything blocking actual adoption of SDL? I'm not holding
>>> anything up am I? Sonke: If there's anything you need done/dealt-with
>>> regarding SDLang-D, let me know.
>
> No, SDLang-D is absolutely fine, it's just me being overloaded with
> other things.
>
>>
>> Do we want/need the SDL parser/writer to be included into Phobos first?
>>
>
> I'd include it as a "git subtree" into the repository, so that this
> wouldn't be necessary. This copy would only used when building DUB using
> the build.sh/.cmd. When DUB itself is used as a package/library, it
> would use the sdlang-d DUB package instead.

Ok, sounds good to me.

But maybe I should put a "std.sdlang" through the phobos review queue to 
help getting DUB into the standard DMD releases?



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list