std.experimental – DConf?

[Wyatt via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 29 May 2014 at 13:34:26 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling 
via Digitalmars-d wrote:
>
> Minor point -- is it really going to be the clunky 
> std.experimental, or is it going to be something elegant like 
> exp.* ... ?
>
> I would prefer the latter. :-)

I think I would too.  But failing that, since we have packages 
now, would std.experimental.* be an acceptable compromise?

-Wyatt