std.experimental – DConf?

[Meta via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 29 May 2014 at 14:50:40 UTC, bearophile wrote:
> Joseph Rushton Wakeling:
>
>> Minor point -- is it really going to be the clunky 
>> std.experimental,
>
> Clunky is good for something that you only use for experiments.
> Short names should be left for good reliable functionality.
>
> Bye,
> bearophile

Yes, I think this is a good case where making things slightly 
harder for users is good. If someone has to think twice about 
using std.experimental because of the long name, then they'll 
probably also think twice about how their code might break.