std.experimental – DConf?

[H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d]

On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 12:03:43PM -0400, Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Thu, 29 May 2014 11:12:00 -0400, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d
> <digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> wrote:
> 
> >On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 10:47:26AM -0400, Steven Schveighoffer via
> >Digitalmars-d wrote:
> >[...]
> >>I think "experimental" spells out "This is subject to immediate and
> >>frequent change. IT MAY BREAK YOUR CODE"
> >
> >No, change that last sentence to: IT *WILL* BREAK YOUR CODE. USE AT
> >YOUR OWN RISK.
> 
> I suppose that is ultimately true if/when std.experimental.blah turns
> into std.blah.
> 
> But for the most part, breaking code for fun or spite isn't the idea
> :)
[...]

Well, I know that. :)  The intention is to dispel all notion of API
reliability and hold no qualms about breaking existing code in the
future, that's all.


T

-- 
Talk is cheap. Whining is actually free. -- Lars Wirzenius