std.experimental – DConf?

[ponce via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 29 May 2014 at 12:10:23 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling 
via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> Requiring people to prove themselves in a popularity contest 
> first seems to me to get in the way of the aim to have a 
> fast-moving, 
> able-to-quickly-get-user-feedback-and-make-breaking-changes 
> part of the standard D toolchain.

On the other hand, if this is really fast moving and with 
breaking changes, one might as well keep it in the DUB registry 
so that people:
- are able to rely on a particular version and have their code 
breaking only when they want.
- get faster updates instead of waiting for Phobos releases.

Is it really fast moving when you have to wait for compiler 
releases? I don't think so.

I also believe there is a positive correlation between "being 
popular on code.dlang.org" and "being useful and with a promising 
design".