std.experimental – DConf?

[Dmitry Olshansky via Digitalmars-d]

30-May-2014 02:15, Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d пишет:
> On 29/05/14 20:46, Dmitry Olshansky via Digitalmars-d wrote:
>> Personally I believe that anything not stable enough simply wouldn't work
>> sitting in Phobos. The release cycle is like 4? months, patches need
>> review (by
>> whom? if its just smb's experiment).
>> And there is the question of keeping 2 forks of the project - one for
>> code.dlang.org and the other for std.experimental.
>
> If something's made it to std.experimental, is there any reason why
> there needs to be a maintained version in code.dlang.org ... ?
>
> As for cycle -- surely an option here is to have a faster Phobos-only
> release cycle that brings in updates _only_ of experimental modules.

It's still syncing N project releases to 1 deadline. Not sensible to me.

-- 
Dmitry Olshansky