Performance

bearophile via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Fri May 30 12:58:42 PDT 2014


Russel Winder:

> A priori I would believe there a problem with these numbers: my
> experience of CPU-bound D code is that it is generally as fast 
> as C++.

The C++ code I've shown above if compiled with -Ofast seems 
faster than the D code compiled with ldc2.

Bye,
bearophile


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list