Why is `scope` planned for deprecation?

Dicebot via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Tue Nov 11 08:58:15 PST 2014


On Tuesday, 11 November 2014 at 16:54:10 UTC, ixid wrote:
> On Tuesday, 11 November 2014 at 15:29:49 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
>> But this is very complicated topic and may take years to fly.
>
> The ship will have sailed by the time it's ready to fly 
> (gloriously mixed metaphors), this would seem like such a 
> fundamental issue with a big knock-on effect on everything else 
> that it should surely be prioritized higher than that? I am 
> aware you're not the one setting priorities. =)

It is going to take such long time not because no one considers 
it important but because designing and implementing such system 
is damn hard. Prioritization does not make a difference here.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list