GC: memory collected but destructors not called
Uranuz via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Wed Nov 12 12:00:29 PST 2014
If we will have something like *scoped destructor* (that will be
executed at scope exit) could it help to release some resources?
I worry about this problem too because even using class to hold
resource I expirience some *delays* in relesing them. For example
I have database connection opened. And I want to close it when I
finished my job. Relying on GC I sometimes experiece problems
like *too many DB connections*, because GC frees it not enough
quickly.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list