Scope and Ref and Borrowing

[Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d]

On 11/13/2014 7:41 PM, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> I'm not quite clear; are you suggesting 'scope ref' would be a storage
> class?

Yes.

> (looks like it, but it also affects mangling?)

Only for function types.

> Please, consider Marc Schütz's existing proposal.
> Please, please, don't make scope a storage class.

Got a handy link to it?

> I have a lot of other issues with this proposal, but maybe I
> misunderstand it in principle...?

I have no idea what your other issues are and what they may be based on :-)