Why is `scope` planned for deprecation?

deadalnix via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sun Nov 16 14:55:52 PST 2014


On Sunday, 16 November 2014 at 11:30:01 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad 
wrote:
> On Sunday, 16 November 2014 at 03:27:54 UTC, Walter Bright 
> wrote:
>> On 11/14/2014 4:32 PM, deadalnix wrote:
>>> To quote the guy from the PL for video games video serie, a 
>>> 85%
>>> solution often is preferable.
>>
>> Spoken like a true engineer!
>
> More like a consultant for self-help:
>
> http://www.amazon.com/85%25-Solution-Personal-Accountability-Guarantees/dp/0470500166
>
>
> Real world 85% engineered solutions:
>
> 1. Titanic
> 2. Chernobyl
> 3. Challenger
> 4. C++
>
Sorry but that is dumb, and the fact you are on the D newsgroup 
rather on 100% solution languages newsgroup (Java is 100% OOP, 
Haskell is 100% functional, Rust is 100% linear types, Javascript 
is 100% callbacks, erlang is 100% concurrent, LISP is 100% meta, 
BASIC is 100% imperative, python is 100% slow, PHP 100% 
inconsistent) tells me that not even you believe in your own 
bullshit.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list