Invariant for default construction

[Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d]

On 11/17/14 3:02 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:
> Walter is about to fix an old bug [1] so that invariants are now called
> before destruction and for non-default construction.

This sounds good.

> A remaining question is whether invariants should also be called for
> default construction [2].

I'd say no. There are better ways to test for valid data in the .init 
version of the object/struct that don't involve a runtime check.

-Steve