std.experimental.logger formal review round 3

[via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 25 November 2014 at 23:41:51 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 11/25/2014 2:26 AM, Robert burner Schadek wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 25 November 2014 at 00:37:00 UTC, Walter Bright 
>> wrote:
>>> Anyone know anything about this?
>>>
>>> https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/2n9gfb/d_is_for_data_science/cmbssac
>>>
>>
>> You mean the second part, about him leaving D because of the 
>> discussion about
>> the logger?
>
> Yes.

He wants a "better C" for system level programming:

https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/2n60wv/the_first_enemy_of_c_is_its_past/cmbn1n4

https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/2n60wv/the_first_enemy_of_c_is_its_past/cmb4ows

And there is no doubt an open spot between C and C++ for a 
modernized system level language.