RFC: moving forward with @nogc Phobos

[Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d]

On 10/1/14, 10:51 AM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> But Sean's idea only takes strings into account. Strings aren't the only
> allocated resource Phobos needs to deal with. So extrapolating from that
> idea, each memory management struct (or whatever other aggregate we end
> up using), say call it MMP, will have to define MMP.string, MMP.jsonNode
> (since parseJSON() need to allocate not only strings but JSON nodes),
> MMP.redBlackTreeNode, MMP.listNode, MMP.userDefinedNode, ...
>
> Nope, still don't see how this could work. Please clarify, kthx.

There's management for T[], pointers to structs, pointers to class 
objects, associative arrays, and that covers everything. -- Andrei