std.experimental.logger formal review round 3

[Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d]

On 2014-10-11 05:41, Dicebot wrote:
> I don't see critical objections so far and this will move to voting
> stage this weekend. Please hurry up if you want to say something bad :)

I think it's unacceptable that the documentation of "defaultLogFunction" 
and "trace", "info" and so on is merged. Same thing with 
"memLogFunctions". Do these even need to be exposed?

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg