Refined types [almost OT]

Meta via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sun Oct 12 16:48:54 PDT 2014


On Sunday, 12 October 2014 at 20:58:58 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
> Yes it is. Why wouldn't it be? Values needn't be completely 
> determined in order to be reasoned about.

They do if you want to check, for example, n < 3. D doesn't 
currently support the type of analysis necessary to implement 
something like that.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list