std.experimental.logger formal review round 3

[Paolo Invernizzi via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 15 October 2014 at 03:45:12 UTC, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
> On Wednesday, 15 October 2014 at 02:54:27 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
>
> Apropos threading though, I'm not sure how to consolidate the 
> fact that we're using shared memory without using `shared`. It 
> seems like a failure to have such an intricately designed 
> memory model, then as soon as we do threading in Phobos, we 
> ignore it.

I've written several times that having the TDPL Concurrency 
chapter as a free link in the main page it's some sort of 
horrible masochism, granted the current state of the 
implementation of what it's described there...

But well ;-/
---
/Paolo