Program logic bugs vs input/environmental errors

[Dicebot via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 15 October 2014 at 07:26:03 UTC, Walter Bright 
wrote:
> On 10/14/2014 11:23 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
>> On 2014-10-15 07:57, Walter Bright wrote:
>>
>>> Why do you need non-fatal unittests?
>>
>> I don't know if this would cause problems with the current 
>> approach. But most
>> unit test frameworks don't NOT stop on the first failure, like 
>> D does. It
>> catches the exception, continues with the next test and in the 
>> end prints a
>> final report.
>
> I understand that, but I don't think that is what Dicebot is 
> looking for. He's looking to recover from unittests, not just 
> continue.

How can one continue without recovering? This will result in any 
kind of environment not being cleaned and false failures of other 
tests that share it.