Will D ever get optional named parameters?

["岩倉 澪" via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 15 October 2014 at 11:52:13 UTC, bearophile wrote:
> ketmar:
>
>> besides, nested foreach with '_' is not working. but "__"
>> can generate unique temporary variable each time.
>
> The point is to introduce a little breaking change in D and use 
> "_" as "don't care", so you can reuse it for nested scoped and 
> for tuple unpacking, and for other similar future purposes.
>
> Bye,
> bearophile

I agree that _ would be the ideal syntax, but why make a breaking 
change when it is unnecessary? __ would serve just as well and it 
is only one extra character. It is already reserved so it would 
be reasonable to put it to good use.