Blaming the D language

[via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 23 October 2014 at 11:45:46 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
> On Wednesday, 22 October 2014 at 08:44:44 UTC, Ola Fosheim 
> Grøstad wrote:
>> On the other hand, C macros can be expanded and then you do 
>> source-to-source translation. With D mixins you might have to 
>> evaluate CTFE first? That's a source-to-source killer.
>
> If it's fairly complex, like turing-complete, do you think, it 
> will be easier than CTFE?

What do you mean by turing-complete in this context?

Both the C preprocessor and D have to terminate in order to 
produce output… And I see no point in translating programs that 
cannot be compiled?