std.experimental.logger formal review round 3

Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sun Oct 26 04:00:38 PDT 2014


On 2014-10-25 18:43, Dicebot wrote:
> Jut for the reference, my position on current state of things as review
> manager is this:
>
> I agree with some of mentioned concerns and would like to see those
> fixed. However, I don't think any of those are truly critical and this
> proposal has been hanging there for just too long. In my opinion it will
> be more efficient to resolve any remainining issues in follow-up pull
> requests on case by case basis then forcing Robert to do it himself -
> there will be some time left before next release to break a thing or two
> before public statement is made.
>
> Because of that I am going to start voting despite some arguments being
> still in process. I hope that won't cause any tension.

As long as the changes don't require a complete redesign. There was some 
talk about using templates instead of classes.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list