std.experimental.logger formal review round 3

[Robert burner Schadek via Digitalmars-d]

On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 12:03:33 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
>
> Ayway, let's come with an agreement/compromise with Martin and 
> I'll start voting immediately after.

Well, as far as I can see his argument was based on old code that 
has long been rewritten and he hasn't answered since I pointed 
that out.