DIP66 - Multiple alias this

Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Mon Oct 27 19:07:21 PDT 2014


On 10/24/14 6:05 AM, IgorStepanov wrote:
> On Friday, 24 October 2014 at 06:04:24 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> On 10/19/14 2:00 PM, IgorStepanov wrote:
>>> Bump.
>>
>> I've made a few grammar and fluency edits to the DIP, and collected a
>> few thoughts while doing that. Will get back on this before too long.
>> -- Andrei
>
> I've seen it. Thanks!
> Waiting for a comments.

Coming soon. I've been under quite a bit of pressure as of late.

> Should I add chapter about method overloading with alias this: it should
> work (and works) as cross-module overloading. It should imply
> This implies from the DIP but hasn't written explicitly.

Interesting. I think it should work like overloading of calls in base 
and derived classes.

> OT: Should `et\s?c\.?` be written as "etc" in English?
> I thought that it should be written as "et c.", because "et cetera". Or
> is it an anachronism?

You can't go wrong with M-W: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/etc


Andrei



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list